2) The two terms coined by the author to describe immigrants' Contingent Pathway to Legalization are privatization of risk and involuntary agency. Explain it.
Both privatization of risk and involuntary agency is a
growing concern to modern society that has crept into everyday life. Both terms
are highly linked together and will need to be parsed out to fully understand
the difference. They disguised as freedom of choice and flexibility. In
reality, it is all about throwing responsibility onto the individual. Privatization
of risk is defined as shifting the cost of the burden from the system or
organization to the individual. In the case of immigrants, as described by
Professor Gonzalez, instead of the companies, immigrants are now responsible
for finding a visa and navigating the complex legal system on their own.
However, if I explain it in this manner, many nativists and extremely
nationalists might not understand the concept. They will complain that
immigrants should have to jump through hoops to get employed in this great land
of opportunity. They will insist that immigrants should cater to this great and
prosperous land and be happy with that they even have the chance to stand in
the land of freedom. So I will explain the privatization of risk in a manner
more pertaining to the current situation.
Privatization of risk is just of the main facets of the
global historical push towards privatization that started in the 1980s with
Regan. Facilities and services once considered public, that is to say funded by
taxpayers, began to be contracted out to private ventures. Everything ranging
from healthcare to water began to be managed by companies looking to make
profits. The ideology was that private sector competitiveness and wealth
generation, the hallmarks of capitalism, should be the solution to improve
public facilities and services. Instead of education being funded by the state,
it was paid by the individual through loans. Instead of healthcare being
universal for all citizens, it was available only to those that could afford it
or were eligible for state-run Medicaid programs. Instead of transportation
services offered by a regulated single line of taxis companies, it was given to
third-party app services like Uber and Lyft.
No comments:
Post a Comment